I hope the author isn't serious. It's silly and wildly unrealistic. Goofy plans like that one only distract from Mark Levin's very sensible suggestions.
I found Levin's proposals completely inadequate. They addressed some of the more peripheral issues with the Constitution without rectifying some of its deeper original flaws. He did not address the manner of treaty ratification, nor the language of the Supremacy clause which fails to assure that treaties which usurp Constitutional limitation are rendered void. He does nothing to assure that usurpation of power carries criminal penalties for officers of the government. Yet the latter is the principal reason why the Feds have gone so far beyond Article II enumerated powers while the treaty power has been the principal "authority" for enactment of those powers.