My problem with these kind of articles is that if we are to take the “scientists” as credible, then they should have predicted this sort of model 10 years ago. They just keep modifying the theory to fit the latest weather patterns.
My problem with these kind of articles is that if we are to take the “scientists” as credible, then they should have predicted this sort of model 10 years ago. They just keep modifying the theory to fit the latest weather patterns.
The AGW crowd (who now call it climate change) is stuck on man-made causes for routine climate shifts. Most of them do not acknowledge intelligent design and they refute an idea that is found throughout nature called homeostasis (balance). The earth has been inhabitable for thousands of years because there are larger mechanisms in place that act to prevent large fluctuations in weather. We find in nature a response for almost everything and that principle also exists in our climate.
The mechanisms are macro and micro and we still don’t understand them. The main variable is the radiation from the sun and each day the energy/heat released by man is barely a measurable fraction in comparison to the heat of the sun. They didn’t get it then and they don’t understand it now. The majority of the models simply ignore the sun when truthfully the activities of man have little to do with how much radiation we absorb and no effect on how much we receive.
Man-made climate change is truly about government control and taxation. It is equal parts wealth redistribution and crony capitalism and it has led to some of our most ridiculous ideas - ethanol, wind farms, solar farms, etc etc.