Replies

That thought occurred to me many years ago.

Here is another one: We are not discriminating against “them”. Our laws are not designed for groups or even for married couples. They are designed for the individual citizen. And “they” have the exact same marriage rights you and I have. There is no discrimination here. The problem is that they want to do something that is not only not allowed, but it attempts to dramatically alter the meaning of plain english words.

Marriage is between a man and a woman. It always has been and always will be. Just as “gay” means happy. Only lunatics think “gay” refers to a man who enjoys pushing his penis into another man’s anus, or being the receiver of said penis.

And only lunatics call two men committing to doing that to each other until death “married”.

The law is very fair, whether you are straight or homosexual you can get married only under these circumstances:

1. Neither party is already married.
2. The parties are not blood relatives, e.g. brother and sister or mother and son.
3. The two parties are of opposite sexes.

And number three is the reason the institution exists in the first place. If mankind did not procreate via sex, there would be no such thing as marriage. Calling the joining of two humans that don’t meet the third condition “marriage” is ludicrous on the face of it. You might as well say a guy is married to his harley.

Which brings us to why this is so important to “them”: This is an attempt from the great deceiver himself to dilute a gift of God - and proof we really are in the end times as described in prophetic, biblical scripture.