No, you're not being facetious - you're lying, with malice aforethought, for pay.
I gave you evidence, from MDs no less. You rejected it because it wasn't approved by the sources you approve of, which you approve of literally because the pharmaceutical companies approve of them. LOL.
And when I point out that your sacred PubMed publishes crap from someone pushing mass murder, well, that simply doesn't matter to you, and it certainly casts no aspersions of the sacredness of PubMed. LOL. And of course those vaccine courts are... irrelevent. LOL.
And then you attack my sanity? What an absolutely monstrous thing to say - literally in the footsteps of totalitarian monsters throughout history, as I pointed out.
You're a mercenary paid for your savagery. And you're hardly unique or even surprising. In fact, in this current world, you're quite common - a word that fits you rather well in a number of respects, I think.
Here's some more reading material for our viewers. (Oh, lemme guess - it's quackery, right? What a surprise! LOLOL!)
Oh yeah, shouldn’t you be spelling your screen name:
XDemMom?
Or is that too tempting for the unwashed to ponder?
It must be so hard to be so special around such... lessers.
LOL!
No, you still have not provided any evidence whatsoever. Instead, you posted links to a slew of crackpot websites, all of which are known to engage in various kinds of deception. There are a variety of tactics that they use to dupe people. One is that they cherry-pick from real medical research reports, taking actual quotes that they twist to say things the actual authors of the reports never said or intended to say. Another is the conspiracy-mongering, which is just pure nutjobbery. They openly lie, making incredible claims that, honestly, a blind recluse would immediately recognize as bunk.
I've told you how to find and access medical research reports so that you can read them for yourself. Other than looking for something published by Peter Singer, have you bothered doing a keyword search on, for example, "measles vaccine safety and efficacy studies"? Since those pseudoscience mongers love to reference scientific articles (to hide the fact that they're pulling everything out of their rear ends), have you actually looked up and read any of those references for yourself to see what they really say?
And when I point out that your sacred PubMed publishes crap from someone pushing mass murder, well, that simply doesn't matter to you, and it certainly casts no aspersions of the sacredness of PubMed. LOL. And of course those vaccine courts are... irrelevent. LOL.
PubMed is not a publisher. It is a searchable database. The publisher of that article by Peter Singer is Journal of Medical Ethics. PubMed does not pick and choose articles from the medical journals that it indexes. It is like a library or Google--it contains all of the information, but the reader chooses which information to access.
And then you attack my sanity? What an absolutely monstrous thing to say - literally in the footsteps of totalitarian monsters throughout history, as I pointed out.
Yes, I do question your sanity. There is something wrong when a person rabidly supports openly dishonest conmen, but attacks those who try to point out (with evidence) that the conmen are dishonest. It is also not sane to interpret lack of evidence as being incontrovertible proof.
BTW, if children were really dying like flies from being vaccinated, don't you think I'd see more funerals going on at the funeral home I drive by every day? Don't you think that people would notice these high numbers of deaths? What explains the fact that over 95% of children have been vaccinated and the death rates are historically lower than ever before? Heck, if vaccines kill, then how is it that I am alive and typing right now?
You're a mercenary paid for your savagery. And you're hardly unique or even surprising. In fact, in this current world, you're quite common - a word that fits you rather well in a number of respects, I think.
Right. I wish I could be paid for the time I spend posting medical information on FreeRepublic. Even though I perform this public service on my own time, I am as careful to provide accurate information as I do for the work I am paid for. You have yet to fact check anything I have posted and prove it wrong or deceptive.
Vaccine Industry Watchdog Obtains CDC Documents That Show Statistically Significant Risks of Autism Associated with Vaccine Preservative Thimerosal
The "MD" quoted in this article, Brian Hooker, is a well-known quack, who has no credibility in the medical community. When thousands of people earn an MD every year, you have to expect that a couple of bad apples will slip through. He is one of them.