All I can say about your post is that it brings into serious question your sanity. But that's not unexpected--I have never seen a situation where someone who immerses themselves in pseudoscience and conspiracy theories is a rational thinker.
I also think it somewhat ironic that the only reference you can find in a medical database is by Peter Singer--a man who ideologically embraces the entire philosophy of the anti-vaccination fear mongers. Anti-vaxxers don't openly state their motives, but want as many children to die of preventable diseases as possible, while Peter Singer is completely open about wanting to kill off children. They make a perfect match.
Not that I think that you are capable of understanding, but I will point out that if profit were the only motive behind pushing vaccines, we actually would not have vaccines. There is a heck of a lot of profit in letting people get sick--doctor visits, prescriptions, hospitalizations, ICUs, caskets, funerals--that is being lost because of cheap, safe, and effective vaccines. Every time someone gets sick with a preventable disease, the epidemiological investigation alone costs thousands... I bet that irresponsible kid who exposed all of those people to measles has netted millions for everyone who is involved with the investigation and quarantine effort.
Finally, once again, you prove yourself incapable of providing any references describing actual medical research to support your ludicrous claims about vaccines. Whale.to? Seriously? Pseudoscience websites NEVER make good references.
LOL, of course my sanity is in question. I'm actually DISAGREEING with you! And besides, isn't that the age-old Soviet and Chinese Communist insane asylum solution for people who disagree? I mean, you've actually spent time telling me what I am supposed to obey. You've made it clear that my positions will not be tolerated. You have checked with your coven and you lodge and your corporate support to make sure you are indemnified. So what's left?
Sanity slander - and if at all possible, an insane asylum.
For my own good, of course, and the safety of the children and families everywhere.
Your murderous arrogance is as foul as hell itself.
Anti-vaxxers don't openly state their motives, but want as many children to die of preventable diseases as possible, while Peter Singer is completely open about wanting to kill off children. They make a perfect match.
People demanding vaccine changes and oversight and answers are constantly stating their motives - SAFETY. YOU, on the other hand, are slandering them vilely while denying your own words as they leave your mouth. YOU are making these lying claims, not some vague third party implicatory source - YOU. What a hypocritical and cowardly slander!
For the truth is that PRO-vaccine people refuse to admit ANY deaths or harms, literally re-writing medical standards and laws in order to evade statistics that prove them wrong. PRO-vaccine people want people with guns to force chilren to receive poison that they refuse to take ANY responsibility for. PRO-vaccine people push vaccines FOR the profit motive because vaccines MAKE PEOPLE SICK. That's WHY "vaccine courts" were created - to HIDE this massive fraud. And because SO MANY people are harmed by vaccines that it would FLOOD the normal courts with lawsuits - which would be heard in the light of day, instead of closed and secret chambers.
Like I said, you're utterly shameless. I've posted what I needed to post to inform people about learning of the risk to their lives - and you and yours will continue to poison and sicken and kill as many millions as possible while raking in trillions in profits, all in the name of saving them, until you are stopped.
You don't consider me sane? Fine.
I don't consider you human.
And what is pseudoscience? Anything that disagrees with YOU.
And what is legitimate? PubMed! Except for Peter Singer, the advocate of murdering millions and calling them acceptable statistical adjustments, just like vaccine courts call the injuries and deaths form vaccines.
Yeah. Except for Peter Singer, who is accepted in PubMed under BIOETHICS, well, PubMed is fine. Except for him. Nobody else. Everyone else is a damn QUACK. Including MDs who publich anywhere that pharmamed doesn't approve of. Because experience and degrees don't matter - because there are NO locked out places for the voices of truth. Pharaceutical companies would be the FIRST ONES to allow the publication of findings from MDs who disagree with them.
First.Ones.
So pay no attention to the arguments, the evidence, the facts, the credentials of the writers or your own stupid brains - pay attention ONLY to the sources PRO-vaccine "people" (and I use that term loosely) approve of.
Or YOU are INSANE.