To: Dr. Sivana
They’re providing tax breaks to VW based upon a non-unionized workforce. I say yank them.
4 posted on
02/10/2014 1:25:49 PM PST by
petercooper
("I was for letting people keep their health insurance, before I wasn't". --- Barack Obama)
To: petercooper
They’re providing tax breaks to VW based upon a non-unionized workforce. I say yank them. Did they get that in writing? I doubt it. I would guess that this was in VW's master plan from the get go.
8 posted on
02/10/2014 1:31:16 PM PST by
don-o
(He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever!)
To: petercooper
They’re providing tax breaks to VW based upon a non-unionized workforce. And where exactly did the agreement say that?
I say yank them.
I have no doubt there are 49 other states that would allow Volkswagon to build their plant and not try to micromanage it.
To: petercooper
Tax breaks should be for all or not given.
16 posted on
02/10/2014 1:34:57 PM PST by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: petercooper
They’re providing tax breaks to VW based upon a non-unionized workforce. I say yank them.Why is it the legislature's business? If VW and the workers are stupid enough to set up a union, that's their business, not the legislature's
17 posted on
02/10/2014 1:36:26 PM PST by
Alter Kaker
(Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
To: petercooper
VW should not get Welfare payments from the tax payer, union or no union.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson