from your blog site:
http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/author/butterdezillion/page/4/
By altering the 1960-64 birth index to include legally non-valid records, the HDOH enabled both Virginia Sunahara and Barack Hussein Obama II to appear in the birth index even though they were sharing a BC# and only one name can be valid at a time under that BC#.
Virginia Sunahara’s name did not show up in a query of the database because her record was voided in order to allow Obama to have a valid record using her BC#.
The extremely rare circumstances of Virginia’s birth and death would allow her BC to be “filed” (accepted by the local registrar and delivered to the HDOH for numbering on the same day) on Tuesday, Aug 8th and yet not be numbered until after the Nordyke twins’ BC’s were numbered on Friday, Aug 11th. Those are the dates CLAIMED on Obama’s forged BC, but Virginia Sunahara’s situation is one of the only situations that would result in that kind of discrepancy.
The discrepancies on Obama’s forged long-form show that the forgery was created from the BC of a girl born at Wahiawa Hospital and having an R as the 3rd letter of her name. Virginia Sunahara fits.
To hide that Obama was given Virginia’s BC#, the HDOH had to give Virginia a different BC# when her brother requested a copy of her birth certificate - which they can easily do in a computer printout, which is conveniently (and illegally) all Hawaii will allow anybody to get a copy of OR SEE. The BC# they gave her is hopelessly out of sequence with ANY method of numbering BC’s (including the debunked alphabetizing theory).
The HDOH hadn’t made provisions to deny long-form DEATH CERTIFICATES, however, so when asked for a certified copy of Virginia’s long-form death certificate, they were forced to take out the top line which had the correct BC#, and replace it with a handwritten note of the BC# they had reassigned her. In doing so they edited out a field that was required to be in that line and botched up the font size, alignment, and wording for the state file number.
~~~~
So what I read here is essentially, aside from the timing of the deception, similar to my analysis, and subsequently a birth announcement for zero appears in the Honolulu press. If there had been no deception, you would see an announcement for the birth of Virginia, UNDER THE NAME OF TOMIYO SUNAHARA.
And three days later, on August 8, her death announcement appears under the same name.
The name is then amended on her death certificate, on August 29, when it becomes apparent there is no record of her birth. And that results in a Certificate of Live Birth being issued that is 400 + past her birthdate.
HDOH cannot issue a copy of her Long Form Birth Certificate, because, as they initially admitted, THEY DO NOT HAVE ONE.
The name is then amended on her death certificate, on August 29, when it becomes apparent there is no record of her birth. And that results in a Certificate of Live Birth being issued that is 400 + past her birthdate.
My impression is that the lack of a BC for the girl wasn't noticed until it came time to made funeral arrangements. Her death certificate shows her with her father's name. The family need to be able to change that, or her record will forever show her as being named Tomyio. To show her name at burial as Virginia, the death certificate needed to be amended. And that's when it became apparent her birth record had disappeared.