Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FluffyTexan; trisham

Right now the US government is using the huge stick of law to force the fag agenda on all of us.

FIghting back vigorously with law is the only solution, along with raising ones’ children properly away from the malignantly vile “gay is good” propaganda.

The opinion of those pushing the homosexual agenda should not be given air time or government money, any more than those pushing pedophilia or bestiality. Just because someone has beliefs of some weird sick and immoral kind, why should those beliefs have the same protection? Belief in behaviors that destroy lives deserve no protection.

Right now and for some years pedophilia is being promoted by many academics and those in the psychology and psychiatry fields as the “next taboo” to be done away with. I am sure you know this. This push to normalize pedophilia is joined at the hip with the “gay” agenda, since many homosexuals molest children and adolescents, and most were themselves molested, thus introducing themselves into the dark world of homosexuality.

The first “Gay Rights” list of demands included the ending of ALL AGE OF CONSENT LAWS.

There are only two sides to this issue.

The side of morality and human civilized behavior, and the side of depravity and evil.

Take your pick.


49 posted on 02/08/2014 8:53:13 AM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

“Right now the US government is using the huge stick of law to force the fag agenda on all of us.”

Because after all - the best way to get government to stop abusing its power is to use government to abuse power to your own ends.


53 posted on 02/08/2014 8:59:44 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
These protesters were not given any government money or public air-time and they were not using force of law to compel the consciences of others.

They raised a sign and a voice. If society can't cope with that then it has other problems causing collapse.

I find the suggestion that tyrannical and autocratic silencing of redress and opinion is required or justified to be repugnant. There are better responses that don't limit the conscience or liberty of others.

We didn't enshrine basic human rights with a little asterisk saying unless I really really disagree with you about what it right and proper.

54 posted on 02/08/2014 9:01:08 AM PST by FluffyTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson