Sorry but the 6,000 year earth thing is just hogwash, it has no basis in anything. The debate between Nye and Ham was not a debate over ID or Darwin, it was at best a debate over young earth theory, which is a non starter.
A debate on ID/Evolution would have been interesting, instead we got a diatribe about a 6000 year old earth that doesn’t relate even to the written history of man. Let alone the actual history of the earth.
It was honestly a waste of about 3 hours of everyone’s time.
Fortunately, your ignorant worthless post took only two seconds to read.
Agreed. Darwinists I'm sure are happy to pull people off the track on such an irrelevant discussion especially when they know their opponent believes in this 6000-year-old earth stuff.
Schools are teaching utterly evidence-lacking Darwinism (no evidence of transference between basic animal groups) as truth ignoring the boundless evidence of intelligent design as overwhelming support of an Intelligent Designer. That should be the debate so children can get taught the truth, not these fables that help generate confusion and an atheist society.