Replies

Okay, it is my belief that regardless of what the law says, if I do something that does not harm another individual or deprive them of the use of their property, there is no "crime".

The definition of what harms another individual is famously very elusive.

Running a meth lab next door to my property may not deprive me of my use of my property directly, nor is it the same as directly assaulting my person physically.

But I think that for the good of myself and my neighbors your purported "right" to run a meth lab on your property should be restricted by law.

Which speaks to a larger principle: each person's actions do not have just one isolated consequence each time they act. They often have multiple consequences.

The historical reality is that the less internal self-control people have, the more external control the state will exert over them.

I prefer a system where the laws are few in number, limited in scope, and strictly enforced.

Of course, such a society only works when citizens behave like adults rather than overgrown children.