Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer
"Existing wood stoves are not covered."

Not yet.

I'm saddened that a FReeper, especially a '99er, is buckling under to the EPA sticking it's nose in people's business.

Shame on you.

50 posted on 02/03/2014 5:10:31 PM PST by SnuffaBolshevik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: SnuffaBolshevik
I'm saddened that a FReeper, especially a '99er, is buckling under to the EPA sticking it's nose in people's business.

On the contrary, they are not and I am not. I pointed out that the EPA is proposing these regulations for new stoves and there is a comment period currently underway. However it seems that Forbes would rather ignore those facts and stir up the rabble instead.

Which is more productive in your opinion, ranting "come and take it" on the internet against no actual or proposed regulation. Or commenting and criticizing the new rules?

54 posted on 02/03/2014 5:13:31 PM PST by palmer (don't feed the bears)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson