Here’s a major problem with the proto-earth - stuff that would be commonly known if folks were more interested and educated in facts more than silly evolutionary lies, conjectures and assumptions.
Recession of the moon from the earth. Tidal friction causes the moon to recede from the earth at 4 cm per year. It would have been greater in the past when the moon and earth were closer together. The moon and earth would have been in catastrophic proximity (Roche limit) at less than a quarter of their supposed age.
That was item number 66 from the following list:
101 Evidences for a Young Age of the Earth...And the Universe
http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth
BTW sickoflibs I do and did just fine in about any class tests presented to me - I also knew when to supply the answers the teacher required rather than the facts he/she knew nothing regarding why they were wrong.
Ham (Creationist rep) just read bible verses, Nye (Science Guy rep) seemed very prepared for this show (which is all it was) and he lectured the Creationists on rather basic facts they didnt seem to know about like the speed of light and how far Australia is from Mount Ararat and that the creationists have not come up with a single Kangaroo bone between the two.(none of this is new)
That forced Ham to argue that there is not a single law of science observed today that we can assume applied even a few hundred years ago.
There ya go, to Creation experts like Ham there are no laws of science we can trust to apply over time(like speed of light) , Yet Ham says he just loves science. That's a great summary of Creationism.
Thanks for inviting me to watch this.
Yeah I scanned it. Now can you address my question of what they drank? You say water. Are you honestly saying they drank salt water?