Well now that’s not the complete truth either. There is not just one evolution nor creation theory and the debunking depends upon who you are talking to.
But this one hydroplate theory [yes, it does include more science than you might think and predictions too] is better than any evolutionary theory because it gives the cleanest overall interpretation of all the signs imho of course...
Center for Scientific Creation - In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/IntheBeginningTOC.html
I have read a number of Creationist Science books.
That link under evidence of Creation cites the standard Creationist argument that its improbable that the building blocks of life came together by pure random accident.
That argument is exactly how I stated it, that it doesn’t support the non-existent Creationist theory, it just straw mans an origin of life theory, which is meant to discredit evolution.
But there is no alternative provided.
So there is nothing to debate.
Its like saying we need to get rid of Obamacare while claiming an alternative is that no-one ever gets sick.