Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JRandomFreeper

That sounds like a Constitutional Amendment. I thought we were talking about an Article V convention, called by 3/4 of the states?

It would mean a “new government” when a sufficient number of states ratify the outcome of a convention. If that outcome is a nice, fat socialist package you will see the demagogues come out in volume louder than we’ve ever seen before. You think it’s bad now? Every Fabian Socialist in the Hemisphere will be running ads supporting the new Hope and Change.


32 posted on 02/02/2014 12:12:33 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (H.L. Mencken: "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Cyber Liberty
You need to read how an Article V convention works.

/johnny

35 posted on 02/02/2014 12:42:08 PM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Cyber Liberty

Your argument is specious. The states must ratify any amendment that the COS proposes. Rabid socialism would not cross the ratification threshold. I see no reason for anxiety here. Beyond that, what is the fear of losing the constitution? The government mearly gives lip service to it now. It is so bad that the leadership of the very people we elected in 2010 are trying to make citizens of invading foriegn nationals for the purpose of...? No, I see very little risk from a convention of states. And I see no hope without one.


38 posted on 02/02/2014 1:32:25 PM PST by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson