To: SoConPubbie
Obama decided a long time ago that he would never go to war to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. This agreement allows Iran to keep its nuclear infrastructure intact and unmolested. It is a political fig leaf that does not prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Rand Paul finds himself in agreement with this policy. He will not endorse American involvement in a foreign war unless the security of the US is clearly at risk. Also the American people are war weary. They are reeling from the enormous futile human and material sacrifices in Afghanistan and Iraq.
4 posted on
02/01/2014 6:09:52 AM PST by
allendale
To: allendale
Just like Daddy, Anto-Semite
5 posted on
02/01/2014 6:11:25 AM PST by
scooby321
To: allendale
Rand Paul finds himself in agreement with this policy. He will not endorse American involvement in a foreign war unless the security of the US is clearly at risk.
And this shows only too painfully, why Rand Paul will never be ready for the POTUS seat.
There is no more clear example of a nation who clearly puts our security at risk, than Iran headed up by a radical Muslim who thinks he is the 12th Imam and wants to wipe Israel off the map as he has continually publically stated. Add to that that Iran is the foremost offender of providing state-sponsored Terrorism and the myopic vision of Rand Paul is on full display.
6 posted on
02/01/2014 6:14:33 AM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson