This Warman guy seems to be a busy little bee re: the formation of the Canadian Thought Police.
More background on the accuser (if the source can be trusted) here: http://silentconsort.wordpress.com/2008/01/22/warman-epithets-unbecoming/
And I think, more info on the background of the whole situation here: (near bottom of the page)(this seems to be the "other sides" argument...I guess calling someone a communist in dafamation in Canada...especially if you live in one of the western provinces) http://anti-racistcanada.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.html
/back to lurker mode
They were reactions to the plaintiff's political activities using the now-repealed thought crimes legislation in Canada. They were comments comparable to what would be found in a political forum anywhere on the net. But if I post any of the actual words, even for the purpose of discussing the case, I will go to prison.
Speaking the truth is a crime in Canada. In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act (Orwell)...