I take it you believe Grimm's actions were appropriate. I do not. That doesn't make a Hitlery enabler. It makes me someone who likes my representatives to operate without any semblance of impropriety. In doing so, it eliminates the opposition's ability to go after them. If I am willing to call out a democrat for unbecoming behavior, I need to be willing to call out a republican for the same. The hypocrisy in not doing so makes us no different than the liberals.
Why would you chastise someone for expecting better from their elected representative?
I’m just pointing out that the modus operandi of the media, team Obama, and many Republicans and conservatives will be, in the following year, to TAINT the electable conservative party—intentionally or unintentionally.
Look, it began early with Christie (rino by our comparison), continued with D’Souza (solid pundit who should’ve been charged with at most a MISDEMEANOR), Radel’s misdemeanor charge (Republicans pushed him out even after he repented), and goes on with this guy who did NOT commit a crime and who is being pursued by the Obama administration....
My point is that ALL of these guys are Republicans...some may or may not have broken the law....but it is NO accident the media is trumpeting every small foible, amplifying any perceived misstep....or, perhaps, outright LYING about the circumstances.
Nothing unusual about that in itself, except the rapid fire in which they are coming AND the fact that Republicans are joining the media in pissing on them.
You are certainly free to bash Grimm. I am not haranguing you, merely pointing to the current trend that will move toward putting Democrats back in control of the House of Representatives next November.
I hope I am wrong, but this looks a whole lot like 2006.