Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

First off, I don’t like Mr. Williamson’s characterization of people who don’t like this as “rabble”. Keep in mind National Review also thinks John Derbyshire is rabble, too.

Secondly, one of the reasons for not allowing facial hair is not just for practical reasons, but to make everyone as close to being the same as possible. That’s why there are regulations for hair and uniforms. Yes, someone with dreadlocks or a punk-rock mohawk can fire a gun. You want everybody to look like a unified force.

Can you imagine an officer with a beard inspecting troops, and telling a soldier with some beard stubble that he’s a mess, and needs to shave?

If having a beard is ok, then anyone should be allowed to have one no matter their religious beliefs.

What’s next, female Muslim soldiers with Burkas?


17 posted on 01/27/2014 6:07:32 AM PST by TheGipperWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheGipperWasRight
Looking back at military history, the idea of uniformity does not translate into a winning fighting force. The British Army of the Duke of Wellington during the Peninsular War was known for its lack of uniformity in dress. The Confederate Army fought extremely well lacking uniformity. These two examples gave and took casualties that would horrify us today.
23 posted on 01/27/2014 6:24:05 AM PST by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson