Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nifster

“not viable” because he/she too young is a FAR DIFFERENT thing than saying the baby is “not alive”

A FAR FAR DIFFERENT THING


40 posted on 01/24/2014 8:20:59 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

The docs did not say because the baby is too young...they said it is not viable due to the mother’s brain death .


52 posted on 01/24/2014 8:48:56 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

The judge said not viable
He did not say viability was due to gestation age.

Two different things again.

The pro life group is fishing for a case to set precedent in Texas on this sort of dilemma

They won’t win.

JFTR....anti abortion here....not pro life


81 posted on 01/25/2014 8:22:07 AM PST by wardaddy (wifey instructed me today to grow chapter president beard back again....i wonder why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson