Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mrs. Don-o

My only problem is...how much is the state gonna spend on lawyers just to recover $6,000?

Is this some sort of important precedent?


10 posted on 01/23/2014 6:13:23 AM PST by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JoeDetweiler
I can see how it would be a HUGE precedent. Eighteen years of payments from Mr. Squirt (that's going to be a whole lot more than just the initial $6,000) plus every other BaByDaddy in the state who thinks he's off the hook because he signed a paper with Mom'n'Mom.

The Mom, by the way (if you read the whole article) separated from her ... uh... "partner at the time" and got on public assistance. That's what triggered this whole thing. She lied to the State that she didn't know the identity of the sperm-vendor, but forgot that the contract between Marotta and the couple includes his name, and the couple talked about their appreciation for him in an interview with The Capital-Journal(!!)

34 posted on 01/23/2014 6:27:36 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" - Jeremiah 17:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: JoeDetweiler

“My only problem is...how much is the state gonna spend on lawyers just to recover $6,000?”

Not a dime. He’ll be entered into the local county’s child support enforcement database and that agency will make his financial life hell until they’ve squeezed out every cent owed.


126 posted on 01/23/2014 8:21:58 AM PST by Rebelbase (Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson