[ZULU]

So what?

If that is the case, it doesn’t disprove evolution. Any placental mammals around then would have been primitive creatures, not cows and lions and elephants.

[ifinnegan]

So what?

If that is the case, it doesn’t disprove evolution. Any placental mammals around then would have been primitive creatures, not cows and lions and elephants.

---

Your driving curiosity and sense inquiry is astounding.

[Daveinyork]

Some years ago, maybe as long as twenty or thirty, I read that some paleontologists believe that mammals existed before the dinosaurs, but mostly lost out in the competition.

[RinaseaofDs]

Disproving evolution is one thing.

Pointing out that there’s never been a shred of evidence pointing to one species of animal turning into another species of animal is something different.

In other words, no frog became a lizard, and no lizard a bird, no bird a pig, no pig a monkey, and no monkey a man.

So, this bit doesn’t disprove evolution, but it does knock a couple of more pins from underneath it.

[fishtank]

"Any placental mammals around then would have been primitive creatures, not cows and lions and elephants."

A bold assumption ... See the video here for Ernest P. Worrell making the same logical mistake you just did.

Your World As I See It - Household Items ("It doesn't know, Ernest. It assumes, but it doesn't know."