Which really came first? The answer might surprise you. (See article.)
Creation.com graphics.
1 posted on
01/22/2014 12:45:10 PM PST by
fishtank
To: fishtank
Catchpoole - sure.
More jokes from the Institute for Creative Research.
2 posted on
01/22/2014 12:53:45 PM PST by
ZULU
(Magua is sitting in the Oval Office. Ted Cruz/Phil Robertson in 2016.)
To: fishtank
They’re getting radiocarbon dates of -20K - -40K years these days. Evolution is a bunch of BS and so are the dating schemes we’ve read about all our lives.
To: fishtank; ZULU; varmintman
Catchpoole's scientific 'theory' is...
Noah after woodpecker:
7 posted on
01/22/2014 1:22:49 PM PST by
sickoflibs
(Obama : 'If you like your Doctor you can keep him, PERIOD! Don't believe the GOPs warnings')
To: fishtank; ZULU; colorado tanker; varmintman; MrB; 2nd Amendment
RE :"
Evolutionists divided over coexistence of placental mammals and dinosaurs" Here's a picture:
10 posted on
01/22/2014 1:28:50 PM PST by
sickoflibs
(Obama : 'If you like your Doctor you can keep him, PERIOD! Don't believe the GOPs warnings')
To: fishtank
The complexity of reproduction would certainly have taken beeleeons and beeleeons of years, because two entities (male and female) would have to develop in sync to procreate. In that long, long wait there would be death instead of procreation. The world would definitely be “void” of life.
To: fishtank
We’ll just have to wait until that POS Øbama weighs in on this important social topic and tells us what we should beleive . . .
18 posted on
01/22/2014 2:01:01 PM PST by
ßuddaßudd
(>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
To: fishtank
Global Warming: Real science doesn't work by consensus so GW theory can't be true.
Evolution: There is no scientific consensus so Evolution Theory can't be true.
25 posted on
01/22/2014 2:44:32 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson