“The weapons used/found (on the body, in the trunk).”
What’s bizarre about this?
At first report the caliber of the weapons used were found in the trunk, but not on the body/at the scene; this changed two or three times in the news cycles.
Another was the style of weapon used: handguns vs. long-guns.
Another was the reports of which weapons were which; (e.g. Colt vs Winchester) which also changed several times.
Considering also that the number of rounds reported to be fired, and the number of casualties/hits, puts his accuracy as something like 90% — an amazing, and unrealistic, accuracy rate for a situation when people's fight or flight instinct is kicking to overdrive.
I can understand rushed reporting; and while there certainly was some of that, the lack of solidity on the basic details (e.g. which style of guns, which guns were used) is bizarre.