[zeugma]

But according to this site, these orders are routine in such cases, and do not imply an accusation of misbehavior, much less that the judge has seen evidence of such. This site does not appear to be political in orientation.

Even if they are the result of an accusation. There is zero requirement that they be substantiated in any way, nor does the accused party even have to be present at the "hearing". This entire section of the legal system is filled with evil and injustice.

[Sherman Logan]

Sounds reasonable to me. Particularly if the existence of such an order will be used decades later to “prove” you’re a bad person.

Which is not to say that WD may not be a bad person. Only that the existence of such an order does not appear to be evidence she is.