Posted on 01/19/2014 9:48:42 AM PST by Innovative
If Republicans spend the next three and a half years destroying each other, it won't matter who they nominate in 2016...that person will be a sure loser.
One thing to keep in mind is that the Left only needs one more leftist on the Supreme Court to have a solid 5-4 majority (even when Kennedy and Roberts vote conservatively). Four of the current justices were born in the 1930s so the next President is likely to have at least one appointment to make.
The 1%’ers have already chosen Jeb Bush.
Bet on it.
This is why Hillary didn't use the mountain of dirt the Clinton Crime Syndicate surely had on Obama. Remember even though Obama was slightly ahead in the delegate count Hillary could have still gotten the nomination with super-delegates and still contested votes instates like Florida.
The Clintons play dirty and they play for keeps. Something extraordinary occurred during that first week of June to restrain a power mad demon like Hillary.
” Something extraordinary occurred “... that I suspect as well, to stop Hillary.
Maybe they traded dirt on each other???
Two Rivals Sneak Away to Meet, and the Hunt Is On
Clinton Sneaks Out to Meet Obama in Washington
This is what really happened
My point of this is that the witless, talentless, meritless Obama could never have become President and remained so without extraordinary power being exerted behind the scenes. In fact not a single political race he has run in could be called ordinary.
“My point of this is that the witless, talentless, meritless Obama could never have become President and remained so without extraordinary power being exerted behind the scenes.”
You get no argument from me on that one, for sure.
You are right on target. The American people want the worst to come.
walter Mondale
Want? or deserve??
Are you still killing your unborn? -- GOD |
LOL. Unfortunately, most people won’t remember Vince Foster.
'Course not. Attention span of sand fleas.
They won't remember, either, people who suicided in the middle of an intersection by shooting themselves six times with the assistance of three or four stocky, cold-bold assassins. Or people floating in creeks and bayous. Or people being machine-gunned in Baton Rouge fleabag motels. Or people who stabbed themselves to death nine times. Or suicided out windows after getting the goods on Slick.
Nothing to see here, folks, move on, please. </off New York Times>
Charles Krauthammer wrote an article about it in the 90's and called it "defining deviancy up" (for you -- minutiae become huge, huge outrages if you do it). (Example: all the "daddy is a secret monster" movies, and further examples Sleeping with the Enemy, The Glass House, and Tombstone ["Ah'm from TEX-usss! <audience hisses>"]).
It was a companion piece to Daniel Patrick Moynihan's coinage, "defining deviancy down", by which he meant the game The New York Times was playing then, of soft-pedaling the crimes of perverts and other disfavored groups (i.e., favored by NYT editors and publishers) and redefining large perversions as piffling little faux pas. This was a necessary first step to rounding on middle-class America and demonizing us.
She and Slick got orders from Moscow Centre?
I don't know that Slick and Shill ever took orders from Moscow Centre -- after 1989, anyway.
By all accounts, their campaigns and presidency were beholden to Beijing and the ChiComms.
But I'm sure KGB remained a "friendly service" providing direction to their many good friends in the "Counterculture/Peace Movement", going back to the days when the latter was run by Active Measures w/ input from the North America Institute.
I sure hope you’re right!
It's not that HRC is popular with the voters. It's that she knows ways to keep potential opponents out of the race and isn't afraid to use them.
exactly
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.