Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: INVAR

I think the response by the farmers should be calm, just informing the EPA that if any eco-terrorist invades their property to harass, menace or threaten them, using the information provided by the EPA, then after exercising their right to self defense, the farmers will pay shipping to have the eco-terrorist’s Earthly remains sent to the EPA for proper disposition, as they would not want to risk sanctions for improper disposal of such offal.

Perhaps packaged in manure, to help insure freshness. Some settling of contents may occur during shipping and handling.


9 posted on 01/17/2014 2:40:08 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (There Is Still A Very Hot War On Terror, Just Not On The MSM. Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
the farmers will pay shipping to have the eco-terrorist’s Earthly remains sent to the EPA for proper disposition

Better "to shoot, shovel and shut up."

Cheaper, too.
19 posted on 01/17/2014 6:44:13 PM PST by RedMonqey ("Gun-free zones" equal "Target-rich environment.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

The farmers should all file individual suits under the privacy Act. Here is the pertinent section;

The Act specifically provides civil remedies, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552a(g), including damages, and criminal penalties, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552a(i), for violations of the Act.

The civil action provisions are premised on agency violations of the Act or agency regulations promulgated thereunder.

An individual claiming such a violation by the agency may bring the civil action in a federal district court. If the individual substantially prevails, the court may assess reasonable attorney fees and other litigation costs against the agency. In addition, the court may direct the agency to grant the plaintiff access to his/her records, and when appropriate direct the agency to amend or correct its records subject to the Act.

Actual damages may be awarded to the plaintiff for intentional or willful refusal by the agency to comply with the Act.

In the case of “criminal violations” of the Act (Section 3 of the Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552a(i) limits these so-called penalties to misdemeanors), an officer or employee of an agency may be fined up to $5,000 for:

Knowingly and willfully disclosing individually identifiable information which is prohibited from such disclosure by the Act or by agency regulations; or

Willfully maintaining a system of records without having published a notice in the Federal Register of the existence of that system of records.

In addition, an individual may be fined up to $5,000 for knowingly and willfully requesting or gaining access to a record about an individual under false pretenses.

While the Act does not establish a time limit for prosecutions for violation of the criminal penalties provision of the Act, it does limit the bringing of civil action to two years from the date on which the cause of action arose. See 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552a(g)(5). However, the time limit for filing a civil action may be tolled for material and willful misrepresentation by the agency of any information which is required to be disclosed, if the misrepresentation is material to the liability of the agency.


20 posted on 01/17/2014 7:42:44 PM PST by usnavy_cop_retired (Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson