First its pot, then its meth and then its sex for kids with adults. Libertarian perverts are quite predictable, and they will use the same arguments for all of them.
exactly where they are headed:
“No More Nanny State... it’s none of their business if I boink my drunken 6-year old”
I don't think anybody's saying that there's no law which could legitimately outlaw action X; I haven't seen anybody on this thread say that the states can't prohibit drugs (or sex).
Please point out to me the legitimacy of the federal government's authority to assert the illegality of drugs.