Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sport
Since the police confirmed that he was unarmed, how could he pull a weapon he did not have?

It is what was in the shooter's mind not what they found out to be fact.

508 posted on 01/16/2014 7:48:05 AM PST by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies ]


To: School of Rational Thought
It is what was in the shooter's mind not what they found out to be fact.

Perhaps you can tell us what was in the shooter's mind and just how you would know that.

509 posted on 01/16/2014 7:56:48 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]

To: School of Rational Thought

And what was in the shooter’s mind set got him charged with 2nd degree murder. Courts of law and juries operate on provable facts. And the provable fact is that the guy was not armed when he was shot.


512 posted on 01/16/2014 8:28:04 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 508 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson