clinton appointee.
For any who think we may be entering some kind of ‘golden age’ for social liberals, you are correct. However if demographers are correct in their analysis of religious trends in Europe and the USA going forward, this ‘golden age’ is likely to be short-lived.
This essay is written from a left wing perspective, but it foretells the coming birthrate crisis of liberalism, to occur in this century.
http://www.jcrt.org/archives/12.3/ramos.pdf
Conservatives, you need not waste your time arguing with liberals trying to change their mind, or give them any sense of ethics. Its not worth your time. The doctrine for conservatives in this day and age is thus.
1) Be fruitful
2) Multiply
3) Keep your kids out of public school
Judicial tyranny — unprecedented in American history, and We The Sheeple just sit here and take it.
Here is the problem: Homosexuals have the same exact rights as heterosexuals. They have the right to marry a member of the opposite sex if they are not close relatives, are both of age, and neither is already married.
The problem is, they want a new right.
Thank goodness the Congress and the States were so thoughtful as to adopt the 14th Amendment way back in 1868 so as to secure the right of gay marriage. That is why they adopted it, right?
Time to amend the U.S. Constitution
Trust me, the queers will win as they seem to do everywhere. Perversion is the way we are going and the courts, for the most part, are in agreement.
Sodom and Gomorra anyone?
It seems like liberals take a perverted interest in imposing their wicket self-destructive ways upon those of us who like them least. Seriously Utah and Oklahoma?
Theses people are incapable of leaving other people alone. If two dikes want to be recognized as somehow man and wife they should do it in a different state among a different people who know nothing of marriage. Perhaps New York for example.
They have no business telling Oklahoman or Utans what to believe about an institution as old as man.
One interesting thing is that this deviancy has finally reached a state (OK) that I don’t think will take it too lightly. The only other (red) states probably more innately antagonistic towards federal tyranny and unwilling to buckle to the degenerate fag agenda might be TX, LA, and MS.
It is time that these judges have their power revoked.
U. S. District Judge Terrence Kern — Clinton appointee. Enough said.
I have long quit delving into the politics of this stuff. It’s like delving into a ripe septic tank.
Still there might actually be a point. Some of these bans, and/or the arguments tendered in court to favor them, might be coming from the wrong angle. As long as liberals can successfully paint it as civil rights, we are going to have trouble.
We need to come from a point of strength here. Why is it virtuous to act straight? We should not be ashamed to point out that anyone can now act any way they want in private and nobody has the right to stop them, and this is as far as we need to go. However, keeping a straight face matters. (As it is said, hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to virtue... i.e. there are worse things to be for a society than to be a hypocrite.)
Well, it minimizes overt influences to folks that will cause them to sink into further confusion. Empirical psychological studies will back this up in spades. And it can be put in terms that even liberals will agree with. (”What goes around comes around” doesn’t just come in a conservative flavor.) For example, if it takes a village, shouldn’t at least the village have a facade which doesn’t say “Go ahead, be an idiot”?
Who the Heck do these Judges think they are in making laws? Especially those that are part of a state’s constitution??
Or more precisely where do they believe we are: In Hell..?
Born in Clinton, Oklahoma, Kern received a B.S. from Oklahoma State University in 1966 and a J.D. from the University of Oklahoma College of Law in 1969. He was in the United States Army Reserve from 1969 to 1975. He was a general attorney of Federal Trade Commission, Division of Compliance, Bureau of Deceptive Practices from 1969 to 1970. He was in private practice in Ardmore, Oklahoma from 1970 to 1994.
Kern is a federal judge on the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma. Kern was nominated by President Bill Clinton on March 9, 1994, to a new seat created by 104 Stat. 5089. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on June 8, 1994, and received his commission on June 9, 1994. He served as chief judge from 1996-2003. He assumed senior status in January 2010.
On January 14, 2014, Judge Kern held that the Oklahoma Constitution's definition of marriage as limited to "the union of one man and one woman" violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The suit, Bishop v. Oklahoma, had been filed by two lesbian couples against the Tulsa County Clerk and others. The ruling has been stayed pending appeal.[1] The amendment banning same-sex marriage was passed by the voters in 2004, and its legislative history was cited in the ruling.[2]
Really bizarre - the Supreme Court held that state laws could not be trumped by the federal law when it came to same-sex marriage - that if a state had approved ssm then federal benefits couldn’t be denied on the basis of the federal DOMA - yet that ruling is being used all over the country to justify overturning state bans on same-sex marriage because of the federal constitution - if anything the Supreme Court decision should be strengthening decisions made at the state level, and when the issue returns to the SC it clearly should look to that prior judgment to uphold state bans - for now, truly the judicial makes up the outcomes it wants and then twists the laws to fit the results...
Did Judge Kern ever quote WHERE in the Constitution backs up his ruling?
” Kerns said the measure violates the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection clause by precluding same-sex couples from receiving an Oklahoma marriage license.”
Oops, just saw it, but it doesn’t make any sense, but dictator-like judges don’t care about that.
Another liberal activist “judge” legislating from the bench again. Wake up America!!!
Why are they not satisfied with a civil union?
Where in the 14th amendment does it say that queers have the right to trump vast majority of American citizens?
It is time for the removal of any judge whom thwarts the voice of the people.