Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley
Then what? They are explicitly saying that they'll serve anybody, but won't do that particular service.

The problem is that behavior is treated as race, and your suggestion would be seen as saying "no blacks served." But in the application at issue here means a Jewish baker must bake a cake for KKK party celebrating a pork fest, or the Holocaust as said. They just need to assert aversion to pork is due to an (elusive) gene.

30 posted on 01/09/2014 5:01:30 AM PST by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: daniel1212
The problem is that behavior is treated as race, and your suggestion would be seen as saying "no blacks served."

Which should also be legal - not that I personally condone refusing service based on race, but the state compelling someone to do business with anyone he would prefer not to, for whatever reason, is inherently anti-freedom.

55 posted on 01/09/2014 6:13:57 AM PST by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson