Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krauthammer: If you subsidize apples, you get more apples. If you subsidize unemployment…
Hotair ^ | 01/07/2014 | Erika Johnsen

Posted on 01/07/2014 12:50:23 PM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: DManA
"Uh uh. We’ll all just pay more for everything."

Imports will cost a little more, but we will be making a lot more money and keeping a lot more money. There will be a 30% increase in the American workforce if we put the unemployed back to work (23%/77% = 30%). The offsetting individual income tax = $1500, which will pay for the increased cost of the imports.

But because 30% more Americans will be working, businesses will see volumes rise. Most of that money will be spent here.

Government would initially be revenue neutral as the decrease in income taxes offset the new tariff revenues. But then as people went back to work, gov't would see a huge increase in income tax receipts. And gov't would be paying out less for the unemployed. It's a win win, and it's the way to fix our budget problems and get out of debt.

41 posted on 01/07/2014 3:29:13 PM PST by DannyTN (A>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DManA
"Uh uh. We’ll all just pay more for everything."

Imports will cost a little more, but we will be making a lot more money and keeping a lot more money. There will be a 30% increase in the American workforce if we put the unemployed back to work (23%/77% = 30%). The offsetting individual income tax = $1500, which will pay for the increased cost of the imports.

But because 30% more Americans will be working, businesses will see volumes rise. Most of that money will be spent here.

Government would initially be revenue neutral as the decrease in income taxes offset the new tariff revenues. But then as people went back to work, gov't would see a huge increase in income tax receipts. And gov't would be paying out less for the unemployed. It's a win win, and it's the way to fix our budget problems and get out of debt.

42 posted on 01/07/2014 3:29:13 PM PST by DannyTN (A>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If you subsidize unemployment you get more democrat voters. If you subsidize poverty you get more democrat voters. If you subsidize failure you get more democrat voters. If you subsidize perverts you get more democrat voters. If you subsidize crime you get more democrat voters.

It’s as simple as that.


43 posted on 01/07/2014 4:34:49 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think that the records show most people on unemployment get a job about two weeks before their benefits run out. Which means they hold out as long as possible before taking maybe a job not as great as the one they lost.

We now have unemployment out to 2 years Like Newt said thats an AA degree.


44 posted on 01/07/2014 5:17:33 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hahahahahahahaha....


45 posted on 01/08/2014 7:44:29 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Johnny Rico picked the wrong girl!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson