Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chessplayer
“Australia, Canada, Israel, New Zealand, Norway, and Sweden are not fit to be called countries?”

And exactly HOW MANY females are able to pass the selection criteria for Infantry, Armor, or Artillery? Canada, the last I heard, had exactly THREE females that passed selection for Infantry and none of them were actively serving in that job.

Training requirements must not be watered down to qualify Suzie Soldier into combat arms. You put both sexes in deadly danger because Suzie thinks she can do a job she really cannot do. Combat is an equal opportunity killer and not a resume enhancement or fast track to promotion. You must be alive to get the promotion or enjoy the resume enhancement. Besides, this is about putting females in officer slots; enlisted females rarely harbor such ambitions.

95 posted on 01/04/2014 12:02:47 PM PST by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: MasterGunner01

And exactly HOW MANY females are able to pass the selection criteria for Infantry, Armor, or Artillery?


No idea. Just responding to to the claim that countries that allow women in combat roles, like Israel, aren’t fit to be called countries.


105 posted on 01/04/2014 10:32:43 PM PST by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson