Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

All I know is what’s in the public eye, that what information is in the public eye doesn’t constitute murder, and that bereaved mothers do not necessarily use the same logic that is in circulation in courtrooms. If she has back-channel information that refutes that assumption, fine. Let’s see it and then we’ll judge.


75 posted on 01/02/2014 12:32:17 PM PST by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Eleutheria5

Once upon a time, long, long ago, I touched on that community, and I guarantee that she has back channel information. In fact, in this article she says “my sources”.

There are so many who have been refused permission to testify. For many of them, logic would indicate they are willing to testify so they had to be prevented from doing so. For others, they probably don’t want to testify, so the refusal of permission is a protection for them.

People talk. People traverse those communities by simple paperwork changes. They bump into each other. They have a coffee together.


76 posted on 01/02/2014 1:31:00 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson