Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart

Not just the Exercise Clause rights, but also the RFRA law rights. But I would bet dollars to donuts that Sotomayor will end up voting against the religious petitioners. She’s just keeping up appearances here by granting the stay — and remember, if she had refused to grant the stay, a majority of the Justices could have granted one anyway. No Justice wants to be humiliated that way, and I’m betting she only did this to avoid just such a humiliation.


41 posted on 12/31/2013 8:50:31 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: pogo101

Possible. But consider that Obama and co want no delays at all. Crualla just said so. Now here comes one of their hand picked SCJs countermanding their decree, even if only a moment.

For an admin that brooks no opposition, and a political cult that considers any racist treason, she’s gonna catch hell.


42 posted on 12/31/2013 8:56:54 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: pogo101

Here’s how it works. The Justice “on call” knows how many votes there are for the stay and enters it even if he/she does not plan to vote for it. She has low seniority, hence her having New Years Eve as her day and hence she being the one to grant the stay. It’s not that big a deal that she did it although I hope she has seen the light.


48 posted on 12/31/2013 9:18:43 PM PST by Mercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson