You pinged me to this thread requesting that I comment on one of the posts. I did comment. I thought it was out of line. Then you attacked me for giving my honest opinion. I didn’t request your input on my post. You could have left the post alone, but instead you had to break new ground in your attacks on me.
What I said was an honest opinion as to what I thought about the post that you invited me to comment on. If you hadn’t pinged me and every other Inman to pat greybeard on the back for his non-sequitur attack on someone who made a simple platitude about the Romney family, then this thread would not have gone sideways.
I stand by my statement that the attack on Romney made in the context of their grandson being ridiculed by the MSM because he is black was uncalled for and out of line.
I have since requested that my name be removed from your ping list. If this is how you treat your friends and allies when they disagree with one post then I no longer wish to be associated with your group.
Maranatha
Thanks for the non ping. My reply was in no way, "an attack". When this black child's situation first came to my attention, my first thoughts were that although by becoming a Romney, he will also inherit many privileges and stands to gain much in life but also is in very much danger of losing so much more in the life to come and that, for eternity.
He would be better off in a poor but Christian family, black or white.
That's not an attack, that's a simple truth.