Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ladyjane

I agree. If she’d been on life support for years, with no sign of improvement, that would be one thing, but we’re talking about less than three months here.


19 posted on 12/23/2013 6:49:37 PM PST by Tax-chick ("Our infinite sadness can only be cured by an infinite love." ~Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

The baby might only need 6 to 8 weeks to be viable. Something is not right here. Maybe it’s not his kid?


21 posted on 12/23/2013 6:54:20 PM PST by defconw (Cibco's my spouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

I agree. If she’d been on life support for years, with no sign of improvement, that would be one thing, but we’re talking about less than three months here.
**********************************************
Child is currently 18 weeks and appears healthy , at the time the mother had the pulmonary embolism the child was 6-8 weeks and unlikely to have been harmed as the brain was not highly developed at that point ... He is fighting Texas law which is designed to ensure that mothers and their children get medical care DESPITE any outside attempts to limit it ,, let him file a suit and wait a year or two for his turn in front of the judge.


53 posted on 12/23/2013 9:03:20 PM PST by Neidermeyer (I used to be disgusted , now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson