Argument from incredulity.
There are reams and reams of evidence for each and every one of our morphological components. Which one would you like to concentrate on? I’ll cite my work. Can you do the same beyond, “It’s amazing?”
Your Darwinist theory doesn’t stand up in the forum of ideas (or in court - it would soon be thrown out for lack of evidence) because 1) the sheer tonnage of evidence for intelligent design and 2) the sheer lack of evidence for transference between animal groups, absolutely essential for Darwinist evolution.