Obviously unaware of Michael Behe, who has in fact posited specific examples.
Which of his examples do you think would prove irreducible complexity the best, for novices like me.
Do you have any issue with professor Behe’s admission under oath that ID is equivalent to astrology? (The “A’s” are Behe under oath.)
Q And using your definition, intelligent design is a scientific theory, correct?
A Yes.
Q Under that same definition astrology is a scientific theory under your definition, correct?
A Under my definition, a scientific theory is a proposed explanation which focuses or points to physical, observable data and logical inferences. There are many things throughout the history of science which we now think to be incorrect which nonetheless would fit that — which would fit that definition. Yes, astrology is in fact one, and so is the ether theory of the propagation of light, and many other — many other theories as well.
Q The ether theory of light has been discarded, correct?
A That is correct.
Q But you are clear, under your definition, the definition that sweeps in intelligent design, astrology is also a scientific theory, correct?
A Yes, that’s correct.
Aware of Behe. Also aware that at least some of his examples, as well as his basic argument, has been sufficiently debunked. But that wasn't really my point. Behe published his book 17 years ago. And even so, ID proponents can't agree on when, where, or how this design happened. There is, as far as I know, no research program attempting to answer those questions. There are no testable predictions. There is nothing but an assertion of ignorance (and an assertion that the ignorance is permanent) followed by a "God of the gaps" argument.