Skip to comments.
'Duck Dynasty' Under Fire Following Star's Incendiary Anti-Gay Remarks
Yahoo News ^
| 12/18/13
| Elizabeth Durand Streisand
Posted on 12/18/2013 7:37:39 AM PST by cincinnati65
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-193 next last
To: cincinnati65
Uh oh. GLAAD’s gonna get their collective panties in a bunch.
To: cincinnati65
Another example of liberal tolerance . I LOVE how they always practice what they preach.
3
posted on
12/18/2013 7:38:50 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: cincinnati65
Phil is not diplomatic when it comes to morality.
4
posted on
12/18/2013 7:39:28 AM PST
by
griswold3
(Post-Christian America is living on borrowed moral heritage)
To: cincinnati65
‘Incendiary” how, exactly?
5
posted on
12/18/2013 7:39:37 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: cincinnati65
By the all accepting lefties. Everybody has the right to believe what they believe. Unless it’s contrary to what the lefties insist on you believing. Like I said. We’re driving the wrong way on the one way street called diversity lane.
6
posted on
12/18/2013 7:40:02 AM PST
by
rktman
(Under my plan(scheme), the price of EVERYTHING will necessarily skyrocket! Period.)
To: cincinnati65
Say anything close to the truth about queers and it’s “incendiary”.
7
posted on
12/18/2013 7:40:28 AM PST
by
867V309
(Obama- he's just crazy enough to do it.)
To: cincinnati65
The media has been just iching to throw some of their poop on these guys.
8
posted on
12/18/2013 7:40:29 AM PST
by
skeeter
To: cincinnati65
I like this guy more and more
9
posted on
12/18/2013 7:40:33 AM PST
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: cincinnati65
Another thread if anyone is interested in the comments thereon.
10
posted on
12/18/2013 7:40:41 AM PST
by
deport
To: cincinnati65
Yeah, Duck Dynasty is going to lose millions of viewers over this.
Not.
11
posted on
12/18/2013 7:40:47 AM PST
by
dirtboy
To: BenLurkin
"Incendiary how, exactly?"
He dared to quote scripture in reference to homosexuality.
To: cincinnati65
At least their show is not on the Cooking Channel !!!
13
posted on
12/18/2013 7:40:50 AM PST
by
Chief901
("Peace is that brief glorious moment when everybody stands around reloading".)
To: cincinnati65
He’s entitled to his opinion. I’ll still watch.
To: cincinnati65
"The stars of "Duck Dynasty" might be America's most popular TV family, but that could change very soon ..." Seriously??? If anything it will make their show more popular in my book at least.
15
posted on
12/18/2013 7:41:49 AM PST
by
fulltlt
To: cincinnati65
I have come to realize that in the media, anti-gay equals not-pro-gay.
16
posted on
12/18/2013 7:42:23 AM PST
by
jrestrepo
(See you all in Galt's gulch)
To: cincinnati65
LOL The idiot author thinks that folks who watch Duck Dynasty (me included) are going to get real upset about Phil’s remarks, and stop watching.
17
posted on
12/18/2013 7:43:05 AM PST
by
Leaning Right
(Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
To: fulltlt
I’ve never watched it before, but this comment makes me want to go out of my way to watch it!
18
posted on
12/18/2013 7:43:12 AM PST
by
MNDude
To: jrestrepo
"I have come to realize that in the media, anti-gay equals not-pro-gay."
Bingo! They're not looking for acceptance -- they want admiration!
To: cincinnati65
Never seen the show - I may have to
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-193 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson