Well, he obviously wasn’t. But if you’re a liberal editor with no ethics it would be obvious that you’d portray him as a “troubled kid” (true) who was “obsessed with guns” (because he used one), and who had “extreme political views” (true, but from the Left, not the Right).
String the right words together, leave out anything “inconvenient” that does’t fit the narrative, and you’ve got it. Another day at the MSM office...
yep