Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C. Edmund Wright

I disagree with you, you can’t “have economic and fiscal conservatism without social conservatism” in America.

Not only will it be less functional, as you mention, but economic conservatism will disappear entirely, as social liberalism in law and culture breeds an ever more liberal and selfish voting base for the left.

You don’t agree with the author totally, but you do seem to be sharing some of his position.


114 posted on 12/13/2013 11:11:05 AM PST by ansel12 ( Ben Bradley-JFK told me that "he was all for people's solving their problems by abortion".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

Well there’s a difference in how you are interpreting my statement and how I meant it.

In the utlimate ultimate ultimate sense, less functional and ultimate demise are much the same. I was talking in the temporal….becuse you might have heard, we have elections every two years and laws are passed every day, so temporal is the debate here.

I’ve no argument with your deeper philosophcal ultimate point at all, but there can be, in the short run, unbalanced conservatism…...


116 posted on 12/13/2013 11:14:03 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson