Genesis 6. Read it.
That is simply an absurd interpretation of 1Cor. 11, even if Tertullian (who fell into the heresy of Montanism) at least partly held to it, which highly metaphorical manner of interpretation of practical teaching foster Gnosticism.
Paul is not engaging in story telling, or metaphorically applying Gn. 6, to the situation, but is literally teaching the need for a head covering, with "because of the angels" referring to angelical beings covering themselves in humble modestly before God, (Is. 6:1,2) and likewise Paul teaches that "women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness," (1Tim. 2:9)
Secondarily it could refer to angels recording all that occurs in the service, as they behold what we do (1Cor. 4:9;) and would be shocked by lack of covering which they engage in before their head.
You can argue about what this head covering literally was, hair or a veil, but Paul was not talking about keeping evil angels from lusting after shapely women. The issue here is signifying submission to headship, not lust.
Gen 6 is clear to me. The sons of God saw the daughters of Adam and found them attractive and had kids who became the mighty men of old (not normal humans). These offspring filled the world with wickedness and so God flooded the earth to kill them all. Why flood the earth to kill normal humans and then immediately tell Noah to replenish the earth? God would just have to flood the earth again. No, these were fallen angels.
Women should keep their head covered with Christ to keep this from happening again. The fallen angels are coming coming back.