[SpaceBar]

This is more about property rights than religious freedom...

It's also about the rights of entering into (or otherwise) a legal contract. The libs have basically asserted that a businessperson must enter into a contractual agreement against one party's wishes. In contract law, that's illegal, and makes said coerced contract worthless and unenforcable.

[Mark was here]

It's also about the rights of entering into (or otherwise) a legal contract. The libs have basically asserted that a businessperson must enter into a contractual agreement against one party's wishes. In contract law, that's illegal, and makes said coerced contract worthless and unenforcable.

Good point. It is like the liberals think everyone and their time and property belong to the government, so the government as the owner of the people and their property, can decide how government property is traded.