“The two men reacted with angry disbelief. ‘It was the most awkward, surreal, very brief encounter,’ Mullins told Denver Westword at the time.”
Bullspit. This was a planned “gotcha” every bit as much as Sandra Fluke’s enrollment in Georgetown University. That is, it was intended from moment one as to set the stage for a legal battle. I’d lay 10-1 odds on it.
You got it.
I could have been a random coincidence, however based on the past tactics of the militant homosexuals, I’d say you are correct.
I totally agree. The whole thing was a set from the activist lawyer to the liberal judge. There is a name for it—it is called “judge shopping”.
If I were this man’s lawyer, I would call all the other bakers in town and ask if two gay men had inquired about a cake for their wedding. If they had gone to other bakeries then the other bakery owners could be called to testify. Could the two gays be sued if it can be proved that they set up this man?