I noticed that you failed to STILL address my whole point. Which was:
Do you think for one moment that it was because he is so adamantly anti-abortion/homosexual marriage/contraception? I'll even bet you that, IF he had spoken as frequently against these "sacraments" of Liberalism as he continues to do against Capitalism and the free market, I seriously DOUBT he would have been selected. Do you agree?
So, do you agree or don't you? You can rave on and on at everyone who doesn't agree with you on whatever point you think you are making but if you presume that "we" are only questioning the naming of Pope Francis as Time's Person of the Year because we are anti-Catholics then you need to adjust your view.
“Do you think for one moment that it was because he is so adamantly anti-abortion/homosexual marriage/contraception”.
So the question back at you. What on earth did Time magazine see in George W. Bush or Ronald Reagan to give them this award. Especially Bush, who they despised with a burning passion. Don’t tap dance around the question. Answer it. What was one thing that Bush did that they agreed with so much that they made George W. Bush of all people the Time Man of the Year?