Posted on 12/09/2013 3:17:48 AM PST by markomalley
Turning our young men into Islamists. If men can’t look and enjoy women, the next best thing - out of frustration - is to rape and maim them.
Are those results normalized for sexual activity?
I can see a higher pregnancy rate in low WHRs due to higher propensity for sexual activity instead of the low WHR being an actual indicator of fertility.
Feminism was created so as to allow unattractive women access to the mainstream of society - Rush Limbaugh’s Undeniable Truth of Life #24
Also beautiful faces: pink cheeks, pretty teeth, large, clear eyes, all indicate youth and good health - strong reasons for procreation.
Simply put: Biologically, girls and women are compelled to put on “displays” to attract potential mates. Extremely common in the animal kingdom. Liberals even defend the “right” of women to dress for display.
Again, biologically, boys and men are just as compelled to *notice* such “displays”, and then compete with each other for the attentions of the females. And again, this happens all the time in the animal kingdom. However, liberals deride boys and men doing this; which sort of defeats the purpose of the exercise.
If you think about it, if liberals are successful in preventing men from noticing women, it is the women who suffer most. This is because competition among women to find suitable mates is fierce already, and over a very limited time frame, and frustration produces some bizarre psychologies in women:
1) “Desperation to display”. In younger women this is usually seen in “overdoing it”, dressing so gaudily that they just look silly. Many others are caught in just the other direction, using increasing amounts of nudity to get male attention. In effect it is screaming: “Stare at my body!” Never look up “selfies” on the Internet, or you will find millions of nude pictures of girls and women that they took themselves, and posted with a desperate plea to “pay attention to me”. It’s just sad.
2) Even worse is “attention addiction”, in which women will stay with any male who gives them attention, good or bad. This is often a technique used by pimps to control prostitutes. It doesn’t matter if he is beating her or dancing with her, as long as he pays attention to her, she will not leave him. N.B.: a superb indicator of an attention addict, with very low self esteem, are a copious number of finger rings and bracelets.
Being denied the ability to observe female displays also fouls up men. Saudi Arabia is well known as a huge importer of Internet pornography. All those men, desperate to look at women, because they are biologically programmed to, no matter what Mohammed thinks.
Sunglasses lads, sunglasses.
The results are for success rates of in-vitro fertilization, which would make it independent of rate of sexual activity. The paper goes into other factors as well, such as the ratio being an indicator of estrogen levels, etc.
Yep, that would certainly remove that variable.
Youth (and thus lack of prior pregnancy) are attractors also because lack prior pregnancies means that the current man's offspring by her would not be competing for care with the children of other men.
Virginity in a bride was prized because it used to be the only way to be sure she wasn't already pregnant by another man.
Beauty in a woman was prized because it increased the probability that she (and your children by her) would be taken care of by another man if anything happened to you.
LIBs dream of a “perfect” world where all will be homos and all woman will be lesbos. The only other acceptable alternative would be trannys.
I guess tranny is the route that they’d urge you to take if you just couldn’t get “over” your attraction to the opposite sex.
Stop checking out women?
No.
You’ll have to kill me to stop me.
“Helen Thomas was quite attractive when younger.”
Yeah, but then the War of 1812 ended and the troops went home to their wives.
and women don’t check out men????
Yes, exceptions that prove (read: test) the rule such as your aunt.
And sad as it seems, our aging — and I’m in that crowd — provides the physical cues to “not molest” or “not approach” this or that female or male, because the chances of successful mating and procreation are not there.
He’s checking to see if he’s scuffed his shoeshine.
Stop puttin' those ideas in my head!
US taxpayers paid for the gazing at women study Rush just talked about
Sarah Gervais http://psychology.unl.edu/sarah-gervais is the women’s studies professor at U Nebraska Lincoln Who got the $300,000 grant
Funded - External
National Science Foundation.
Objectification, affective forecasting, and sexual harassment (SES-1122683), Co-Principal Investigator, 2011-2014 ($300,000).
Literally right out of 1984. Quite a bit of the story is based on this stuff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.