Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: faithhopecharity

So any promise made no matter how untenable is sacrosanct? Are you a government employee pensioner? Unions agreed to take promises in the hope that they could force contributions. The only thing that counts in a pension fund is hard assets. If the unions would have insisted on immediate cash contributions the politicians and voters would have scaled things way back. Instead they hoped to force a future someonelse to pay.

Sorry but I am under no obligation to fund promises I was not a party to.


34 posted on 12/03/2013 9:31:42 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomNotSafety

“Sorry but I am under no obligation to fund promises I was not a party to.”

Agree 100%.

This ruling would, though, make it such that you and I are now obligated to pay one way or the other for these people.

It just shifts the burden to support them to the Federal government and Obama is smiling big time.

Unions and crooked dem machine pols are singing happy songs for getting let off the hook.


45 posted on 12/03/2013 9:59:48 AM PST by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson