Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LachlanMinnesota

There was an article earlier on FR this morning, which talked about them building “giant containment tanks” for the contaminated water. It’s melting/dissolving starfish in the Pacific and that side of the world. From what I’ve read on other sites, the contaminated water is still pouring into the ocean. We have a problem coming which no one knows the scale of.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AS_JAPAN_NUCLEAR?SITE=MYPSP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-12-03-10-15-46


14 posted on 12/03/2013 8:51:02 AM PST by Carriage Hill (Peace is that brief glorious moment in history, when everybody stands around reloading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: carriage_hill

There are stories about hair loss and sores on polar bears, reduced salmon populations, seal deaths along the Cali coast, and radioactivity in the algae by Hawaii. Wouldn’t such a terrible disaster have more coverage? Chernobyl was on the air forever talking about contamination and there is a large dead zone around it to this day. Was not Fukushima at least as severe, if not worse?

I don’t want to be alarmist, but it seems to me that there is virtually no coverage on the topic. That always makes me suspicious, and I wouldn’t eat sea food from the Pacific until someone starts explaining things.

Anyone know where I can get a reliable and inexpensive Geiger counter?


17 posted on 12/03/2013 9:06:26 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson