But where was Mr. McCracken located when Mr. Jurney arrested him? That doesn't seem to be specified.
At any rate, this case is dated 1935, when there actually was a detention facility in the capitol which the Sergeant at Arms could use to lodge detainees. The jail is still there -- but is no longer capable of handling overnight "guests".
Consequently, the Congress must now rely on the DOJ to provide detention facilities. And I believe they must also rely on the DOJ to enforce their arrests away from Capitol Hill. See McDougal, Susan of Whitewater fame for a demonstration.
Despite voting to hold Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. in contempt of Congress, theres little House Republicans can do in the short term to compel him to turn over documents unless it wanted to revisit a long-dormant power and arrest him."Inherent contempt, is well-established by precedent, has been confirmed by multiple Supreme Court rulings, and is available to any Congress willing to force such a confrontation" - in other words, count on a dog & pony show from the Vichy RepublicansThe thought is shocking, and conjures up a Hollywood-ready standoff scene between House police and the FBI agents who protect the attorney general. Its a dramatic and unlikely possibility not least because Congress doesnt even have a jail any longer. But in theory it could happen.
Republicans say its not even under consideration, with House Speaker John A. Boehners spokesman flatly ruling it out.
But the process, known as inherent contempt, is well-established by precedent, has been confirmed by multiple Supreme Court rulings, and is available to any Congress willing to force such a confrontation.
The House is scared to death to use the inherent contempt power, said Mort Rosenberg, a fellow at the Constitution Project...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jun/28/house-could-arrest-holder-with-inherent-contempt-p/