[jimfree]

That was last week. False flag?

[Resettozero]

That was last week. False flag?

Would you please explain your use of the term "false flag" in relation to last week's TPNN article that I first saw this morning and could not find previously posted on FR? Thank you.

[tanknetter]

Probably. Given that there’s what appears to be a big discrepency between what McConnell was accused of saying and what he actually said, we need to know who the anonymous source was. Which isn’t going to happens. Do it could be Dems trying to sow further dissention within GOP ranks, or a Conservative looking to take a major shotvat McConnell.

I’d add that I’ve believed that the nuclear option had little to do with nominees a d everything to do with increasing the level of partisan bickering in order to distract from ObamaCare.

The important thing here is to understand that we always need to be skeptical and vigilant of accusations like this. We are the high information voters, right? People can oppose, or support, people like McConnell all they’d like, so long as their position is informed and supported by fact, not rumor, innuendo or cheap untruthful accusations.

We, FRiends, must operate on higher level and standards.

[Resettozero]

That was last week. False flag?

Again, I make a sincere request of you: Would you please explain your use of the term "false flag" in relation to last week's TPNN article that I first saw this morning and could not find previously posted on FR? Thank you.

I understand what a black flag is and understand how the term is generally used as false flag here on FR. But my head is thick this morning, I suppose, and I do not understand who you suspect was responsible for this potential false flag you suggest. If you mean the usual suspects (Dems, press, etc.) then I guess I agree with you.